How to Sell to Electric Utilities as Grid Spending Rises

    Short answer

    A buyer map for small suppliers entering US electric utilities, from engineering and standards teams to supply chain, operations and the outbound plan that reaches them.

    Artem Smirnov
    Artem Smirnov

    Last updated · 12 min read

    Artem Smirnov in a dark suit against a charcoal studio backdrop, next to the line 'SELL TO UTILITIES. Follow the grid spend, then map the buyer'

    To sell to an electric utility, win over the engineers and standards people before purchasing ever sees your name. Four moves do most of the work:

    1. Tie your product to one specific slice of grid spending.
    2. Map the people who specify it, approve it and operate it.
    3. Clear the supplier and standards checks before you talk price.
    4. Reach every relevant person at every utility on a finite, named list.

    This guide covers US electric utilities: investor-owned companies, public power and cooperatives. Major US utilities spend far more on transmission and distribution than they did 20 years ago. A supplier with a real fit has a good reason to be heard.

    What sinks most supplier campaigns is the order of work. Founders write the email first and figure out the buyer later. Before any copy, I want to know who already bought from the supplier and who signed off on it. The full method is in how to pick the market before writing a single line of outreach.

    Why are electric utilities buying more right now?

    Utility spending on getting power to customers has grown for two decades, and most of the growth sits in the grid. EIA counts $320 billion spent by major utilities in 2023 to produce and deliver electricity. In 2003 the figure was $287 billion, so that is a 12% rise in real 2023 dollars. Capital investment in electric infrastructure drove most of the increase (EIA Today in Energy, November 2024).

    The delivery side moved the most. Transmission spending nearly tripled over those 20 years, to $27.7 billion. Distribution capital spending rose 160%, to $50.9 billion in 2023.

    Investor-owned companies keep pushing the totals higher. EEI reports they put $32.6 billion into transmission and $60.2 billion into distribution in 2024, the latest year it reports, and projected $39.9 billion of transmission spending for 2025 (EEI industry data). These are EEI's figures for its own members, so compare them year to year within EEI, not with the EIA totals above.

    Federal policy points the same way. The Department of Energy is targeting 16% more long-distance transmission capacity by 2030 and 7,500 miles of new lines (DOE grid deployment and transmission).

    A rising total does not mean every supplier wins. It means there is a budget line your product can attach to, and your outreach should name that line. This is how to turn the spending signals into a target and an angle:

    Spending signalSupplier categories that fitWho to reach firstOutreach angle
    Transmission build-outLine hardware, conductor, structures, survey and design engineering, construction supportTransmission engineering and project leadershipCapacity to deliver on a project schedule, with comparable projects named
    Distribution capital programsPoles, transformers, switchgear, field crews, vegetation workDistribution engineering and line operationsFewer delays on work already in the plan
    Overhead lines, $17.4 billion in 2023 (EIA)Inspection, hardware replacement, clearance workOperations and asset managementCondition data on lines they already own
    Underground lines, $11.8 billion in 2023 (EIA)Cable, boring and trenching contractors, splicing crewsDistribution engineering and constructionCrews and materials ready for undergrounding projects
    Energy storage, $723 million in 2023, up from $97 million a year earlier (EIA)Storage integration, interconnection studiesGrid planning and engineeringKnow-how for a budget line that is still small and new
    New interregional lines, backed by DOE's $2.5 billion Transmission Facilitation ProgramSiting, permitting, land and environmental workTransmission development teamsHelp with siting, since DOE notes a new line can cross federal, state, local, tribal and private land

    Pick one row. If your company seems to fit four of them, read the offer section before you build any list.

    Who buys at an electric utility, and who sits in the room?

    A utility has no single buyer. It has layers, and each layer can stop you on its own.

    • Engineering. Transmission, distribution, substation, protection and planning engineers decide whether your product solves a real problem on their system. Typical titles: VP of Transmission, Director of Distribution Engineering, Principal Engineer, Protection and Control Supervisor.
    • Standards. This group owns the specifications and the list of approved materials. If your product is not in their standards, field crews cannot order it. Typical titles: Standards Engineer, Director of Engineering Standards.
    • Operations. These are the people who live with your product every day. Typical titles: Director of Line Operations, Substation Superintendent, VP of Operations, Asset Management Director.
    • Supply chain. This team runs sourcing events, supplier qualification and contracts. Typical titles: Director of Supply Chain, Strategic Sourcing Lead, Category Lead.
    • Leadership. Leadership signs off on the large programs. That can be a COO or a VP of Grid Operations, or, at many cooperatives and municipal utilities, the general manager or CEO.
    • IT and security. They come in when your product connects to anything or stores utility data.

    Do not pull these titles from a lead tool because they sound senior. Before a single title goes on a list, I want to see the supplier's own past projects and whose sign-off each one needed. The list then uses those exact titles for the niche, never a vague "manager" label.

    Ownership changes who is in the room and how fast they move:

    Ownership typeWhat drives the buyingWho you will deal withWhat to plan for
    Investor-owned utilityLarge capital programs, the ones the EEI totals describeA separate team for every layer aboveFormal sourcing, several approvals, the slowest path, the largest orders
    Public power (owned by a city or other public body)Local reliability and expansion needsA utility director plus a small engineering and operations teamA public approval step on bigger purchases
    Cooperative (owned by its members)Member service and reliabilityA general manager and one or two people covering engineering and operationsFewer layers, but one person wears several hats

    What is the approval path before a utility buys from you?

    A first yes from a utility is rarely the final yes. An engineer can love your product and the deal can still die two floors away. Plan for this sequence:

    1. Engineering interest. Someone agrees the problem is real on their system.
    2. Technical and standards review. Your specs are compared to theirs. This can mean samples, testing or a small trial before your product goes on the approved list.
    3. Supplier qualification. The utility checks the company behind the product: financial health, insurance, safety record, references, and a security review if anything you sell connects to their network.
    4. Sourcing. Supply chain runs a bid, a request for proposal or a contract negotiation.
    5. Field use. Operations orders it, uses it and decides whether the second order happens.

    This sequence changes what your first message should say. Pricing belongs at step 4, so leave it out of the first touch. Lead with what a standards engineer needs: the specifications you meet, where your product is already in service, and what an evaluation would involve. Ask for a short conversation about how they qualify a new supplier in your category.

    The checking also starts before anyone replies. An engineer who gets your message will look at your website and your LinkedIn profile. If the spec sheets, certifications and field references are missing, they may stop there.

    When a company tells me it has a lead generation problem, I often find a packaging problem underneath it. For a utility supplier, that would look like this: the product qualifies, but nothing the buyer sees online proves it.

    Which utility types should you target first?

    Use these routing rules to pick the first list.

    Rule 1: big capital work goes to investor-owned utilities first. If your product rides on transmission projects or large distribution builds, start where the largest programs sit. The path is slower, but the orders match the effort.

    Rule 2: fast adoption goes to cooperatives and public power first. If a small team can approve and use what you sell, such as inspection, field services or tools, fewer layers can mean a quicker first win. That win becomes the reference that opens bigger doors.

    Rule 3: start from who already bought. When my team builds a target list, we check the supplier's past and current clients first, then look for organizations that resemble them. If two cooperatives already use your product, the next cooperatives of similar size are your first list, not the largest utility in the country.

    Rule 4: start near where you can show up. Every target is in the US, but region still matters. A message from a supplier who can be on site next week reads differently from one sent from the other side of the country. Where the market allows it, keep the first list close to home.

    Rule 5: in a small market, skip intent data. Intent data is a tool, and it earns its place in large markets. When a market has about 2,000 target companies and intent signals show up on only about 10 of them, my team skips intent data and builds an offer that fits the whole market instead.

    Then count the accounts. Write down every utility that fits your row from the spending table, the people on each layer, and the region. This is a finite list, so building it carefully is most of the campaign. What to check on it before anyone sends is in how I take a B2B lead list apart.

    What should your offer look like for utility suppliers?

    One use case, one type of utility, one region. A utility engineer reads a full service menu as a sign that you are not a specialist in their problem.

    Three made-up examples of what a single offer can look like:

    • Drone inspection of overhead distribution lines for Midwest cooperatives, delivered as a ranked repair list
    • Boring and splicing crews for municipal utilities moving neighborhoods underground
    • Interconnection studies for public power utilities adding their first battery storage

    Each one settles who gets contacted, what the opening note covers and which past project to show.

    Packaging decides whether the outbound works. When the market can tell in seconds what problem you solve, for which utility and why you, the same messages and the same volume start producing replies.

    Keep the first ask small: a meeting, nothing more. A free call still costs the engineer time, so give them a reason rooted in their own system. Put a past utility project or result inside the message itself.

    Utility buying cycles outlast any month-two rewrite, so I hold to one offer and one audience for a full 12 months. See why one offer and one audience deserve twelve months.

    How do you reach a small utility market without wasting list volume?

    A countable market needs two kinds of reach. You need breadth across every utility that fits, and depth inside each one.

    Depth means multi-threading: reaching several people at the same utility, each with a message written for their layer. The engineer hears about the problem on their system. The standards engineer hears about specs and evaluation. Supply chain hears about qualification and delivery. Here is a starting point by account size:

    AccountPeople to reachLayers to cover
    Large investor-owned utilitySeveralTransmission or distribution engineering, standards, operations, supply chain, one VP
    Mid-size public power utilityA fewEngineering lead, operations, purchasing, the utility director
    Small cooperativeOne or twoGeneral manager, plus the engineering or operations lead

    Watch your title filters. Do not search on bare generic titles like Assistant, Manager or Associate, because they pull in people who neither specify nor approve anything. Search on the function instead, such as Standards Engineer, Distribution Engineering Manager or Supply Chain Director. At a cooperative, the top executive is often the general manager, so add that title by name.

    Volume still matters here, just in a different form. You need quantity and quality, and quality alone will not carry you. A short hand-picked list is not a plan. With a list that small, buyers who are busy or not ready decide your month for you.

    So contact every fitting person at every fitting utility, not a hand-picked few. Expect fewer calls a month than a broad market gives, each one worth more. Our clients' deals typically start at USD 10,000, and many run to six or seven figures. On those terms, a handful of the right conversations a month can pay for the whole effort.

    When you run out of accounts, go deeper before you go wider. Add the next layer of titles at the utilities you have already contacted, then the next ownership type, then the next region.

    What should your first outreach sequence look like?

    Run LinkedIn and email as one sequence. Make LinkedIn the first touch and follow with email, so the engineer recognizes the name in the inbox. Plan several touches across both channels, not a single message. The mechanics are in how to build a follow-up sequence across LinkedIn and email.

    Keep every message short and human, and written to the person's role. A first touch on LinkedIn to a standards engineer can be as simple as this:

    Hi [first name], I see you look after distribution standards at [utility]. We supply [product] to cooperatives in [region] and it is already approved at [two utilities]. Would it help to compare notes on how you evaluate new suppliers in this category?

    Then space the follow-ups with real gaps between them. Each follow-up should add something new instead of asking "did you see my last note":

    [First name], one more thing that may be useful. [Utility of similar size] cut [problem] on its overhead lines after a trial of [product]. If your team has a similar project planned, I can send the evaluation summary we gave their standards group.

    Both templates are illustrations, so fill the brackets with real projects only.

    How do you know if utility outbound is working?

    Judge it by stages. Signed contracts in month one are the wrong yardstick. In the B2B outbound my team runs, calls can come in the first 30 days, while the deals from those calls may close 4 or more months later. B2B sales cycles commonly run 6, 9 or 12 months. Your utility cycle will have its own length, and the approval path above leaves plenty of room for it to run long. I recommend giving outbound at least 3 months to collect feedback and adjust. About 6 months is the usual time to get it fully working.

    Set the early goal as conversations started. In this channel, conversations lead to calls, and calls lead to clients. Booking a call and closing a deal are separate skills, so measure them separately.

    Use this checklist to find where the problem is:

    • No replies from any layer at any utility: the offer or the segment is wrong. Go back to the spending table and the offer section.
    • Replies that say "talk to someone else": the list has the wrong titles. Rebuild it from who signed past projects.
    • Connections accepted but no answers: the message is wrong. Shorten it, make it about their system and add a utility reference.
    • Calls that stall after the first meeting: the approval path is the blocker, and more calls will not fix it. Prepare the standards and qualification material before the next call.
    • Steady conversations, slow contracts: this is normal for utilities. Keep the sequence running and track each account's approval stage.

    If you want help building a utility buyer list, or just have a question about reaching utilities, grab a time with me.

    Questions utility suppliers ask

    Should a supplier wait for a utility RFP?

    Respond to the requests for proposals you genuinely fit. Just do not let them be your only channel. A bid is the late stage of a process that starts with engineering interest and standards review. If those people already know you when the next request goes out, you are competing as a known supplier instead of a stranger.

    Do I need a utility reference before starting outreach?

    It helps a lot, because utility buyers lean on proof. If you have none yet, use your closest adjacent work, such as industrial sites or contractors that serve utilities. Then offer a small, low-risk evaluation. Your first cooperative or municipal customer becomes the reference for the rest of the list.

    Does content marketing work for selling to utilities?

    As a support, yes. Content gets attention, but the deals come from direct conversations with engineers, standards staff and supply chain. Publish the proof an engineer looks for while vetting you, and keep direct outreach as the engine.

    Want to get more B2B clients for your business?

    I help B2B companies book 10 to 100+ qualified sales calls per month with outbound. Let's see if it fits yours.

    Artem Smirnov
    Artem Smirnov

    I help B2B companies book qualified sales calls with cold email and LinkedIn outbound.